Archive for January, 2010

Restaurant Reviews

If I were a chicken, I would request my body be fried up and drenched in a juicy hot sauce for the patrons of Anchor Bar. Saucilicious.

Horizontal and vertical: The evolution of evolution

Horizontal and vertical: The evolution of evolution:

Evolution will always be about change as a result of some organisms being more successful at surviving than others. In the Darwinian model, evolutionary change occurs because individuals with genes associated with successful traits are more likely to pass these on to the next generation. In horizontal gene transfer, by contrast, change is not a function of the individual or of changes from generation to generation, but of all the microbes able to share genetic material. Evolution takes place within a complex, dynamic system of many interacting parts, say Woese and Goldenfeld, and understanding it demands a detailed exploration of the self-organising potential of such a system. On the basis of their studies, they argue that horizontal gene transfer had to be a dominant factor in the original form of evolution.

For some reason, that hasn’t showed up on Richard Dawkins’ website yet. Dunno why.

Today in Haiti

Today in Haiti we come to the real crux of the question. At the end of a hundred years of trial, how does the black man govern himself? What progress has he made? Absolutely none.

When he undertakes the task of government, he does so, not with the intent of promoting the public weal, but for the sake of filling his own pocket. His motto is still, “Pluck the fowl, but take care she does not cry out.” Corruption has spread through every portion and every department of the government. Almost all the ills of the country may be traced to their source in tyranny, the ineptitude, and the improbity of those at the helm of state…. Can the negro rule himself? Is he congenitally capable?…. Today, and as matters stand, he certainly cannot rule himself.

—Hesketh Prichard, Where Black Rules White (1900)

(via)

Also: Haiti Aid Efforts Go Awry in the ‘Convoy to Nowhere’

Fear of Riots As Tonnes of Food Lie Awaiting Distribution

Not so stolen generations

Ruthless (Haitian) People

The average IQ in Haiti is ~70.

You need to have an IQ above 115 in order to be even minimally competent even in the easier branches of engineering (e.g., civil).

In Haiti, that’s three standard deviations above the mean, i.e., 99th percentile. And anyone with that level of intelligence will have brain-drained out to the civilized world as soon as they could haul their nigger asses out of that shithole (pop. 9 million), to somewhere that they could make decent money (and be hired in minority-preference to whites who were born here).

So it’s no surprise that buildings collapsed during the 7.0 earthquake, given that it was Haitian engineers who designed them: Those buildings were designed by literal incompetents, in the profession. Presidential palaces, low-rise apartment blocks, cathedrals, schools, power plants, malls (if they have any)—all were designed by literally incompetent engineers/architects. No doubt the foremen and grunts who put the structures up were niggardly incompetent too; but it wasn’t just that they were too stupid to follow building codes—they weren’t the ones who designed buildings with “unwieldy slabs of concrete.”

And through all this, I can’t stop thinking of the lines in Ruthless People:

“And then we’ll fly to Haiti.”

“That’s Tahiti.”

(“Either he’s a complete moron, and complete morons are rare….”)

Mr. Hurricane

Undress You

If you can imagine a nineteen-year-old Mena Suvari, with dark brown hair cascading down to her aureoles, having dinner in a pub on a Friday evening with her only slightly less fetching girlfriend … well, that was my fantasy-prone entertainment tonight. Along with the $9.99 nachos.

At least it gave me an idea for a song:

Undress You (With My Eyes).

Pizza Diversity

Stopped for a slice of pizza on the way home tonight, while on my way to check my post-office box near the University of Toronto.

Some new gangly half-black guy was behind the counter along with the slim-but-unattractive Asian girl who’s worked there forever. For his sake, I hope it was his very first day on the job (I really don’t think it was), ’cause he only left it in the oven to re-heat for half as long as he should have, so the cheese wasn’t properly melted; and when he cut the slice in half, he didn’t cut it all the way through. It ended up being the worst slice of pizza I’ve ever purchased.

How incompetent and “niggardly” do you have to be, to not be able to re-heat and cut a slice of pizza properly? It ain’t rocket science, Sambo!

Then had the pleasure of having to pick up a couple of mailed items from a palpably two-digit-IQ black monkey-woman in a drugstore … wearing a “SUPERVISOR” tag! I would have far rather dealt with the reasonably attractive Asian woman who’s worked there forever … and who needed to show the monkey how to scan the barcodes on the mail items, ’cause that “supervisor” didn’t know how to do it.

(Is “supervisor” really a title in the post-office hierarchy? And seriously: I had cards for two items, and the monkey-woman needed to be told to scan the first one in, and then fetch the second one from the back room, in that order. Don’t ask me….)

“Diversity is strength.” It’s also higher-primate post-office “supervisors,” and immigrants (please don’t tell me he was a U of Toronto student) who can’t re-heat pizza competently.

I want my country back.

P.S. Admit it, you’ve always wondered how poorly the buildings were constructed in Haiti:

The audience at last Tuesday’s UC Berkeley lecture given by Eduardo Fierro, one of the first U.S. earthquake engineers to visit post-quake Haiti, collectively cringed as Fierro showed slide after slide of haphazard columns, brittle frames, and slipshod rods and joints. “This was not an earthquake disaster,” Fierro said. “[This] was caused by people that didn’t know how to use codes, that built things in bad shape. These were the people that caused the tragedy.”

Fierro, a Peruvian native who has worked around the Pacific rim, arrived in Haiti within two days of the earthquake to investigate the destruction caused to the country’s built environment. From Port Au Prince to smaller cities like Leogane, from cathedrals to schools to power plants, Fierro found that the same architectural mistakes were made over and over again….

Fierro concluded the seminar with photographs of local reconstructive efforts currently taking place. Things don’t look much better—new construction is proceeding the same way as before the quake. “Same little columns, same blocks, same lack of rebars,” Fierro said.

So much for the Steveospheric idea that all the gobs of Western money flowing into Haiti will rebuild it to a state better than it was before the quake. Not when you leave it in their hands, it won’t, even in the absence of government corruption.

Prior to Archimedes, the basic method of construction in even the most-developed parts of the world was to build things as tall as you dared, and then hope that they didn’t fall down. Especially in an earthquake. Of course, that was more than two thousand years ago, back when Diogenes was masturbating in the agora. Some of our world’s cultures have learned a thing or two about civil engineering since then.

Thankfully, there is a solution to Haiti’s construction woes:

“Better code and better design isn’t the answer,” Fierro said. He stressed that the rebuilding process must be simple and supervised. [By whom? Whitey?] One idea: distributing a “cartoonish” booklet depicting the right construction processes—a guide so easy to understand you “don’t have to be an engineer” to read it.

No, but you still have to be able to read. At least a little. Even for a “cartoonish” booklet which the locals might be able to understand and follow. (Suggested title: Curious George Builds a House. They could relate to the monkey theme, right? if not to the “imperialistic, colonial” yellow hat.) And therein lies the rub.

Maybe if they did it as a hip-hop video instead.

Those collapsed structures were not built without plans—architects, professional engineers, blueprints, cranes, the whole nine yards. If those houses and buildings were incompetently “constructed with unwieldy slabs of concrete,” that’s not simply from grunt-working non-engineers not being able to understand geek-speak. Rather, it’s the product of wild incompetence even among the architects and engineers themselves—graduates of Haiti’s many esteemed (and black-self-esteem-producing) universities, no doubt. Civil engineering is another thing you can’t bullshit or affirmative-action your way through. You can figure that out beforehand, or you can find it out the hard way, when people die from low-IQ black incompetence.

The latter is precisely what has happened in Haiti. It happens in the West too, with affirmative-action admissions to medical degree programs, where the differential in competence is literally killing people in the name of political correctness; you just don’t hear about that, except that it’s implied in the high cost of malpractice insurance. Wouldn’t you love to see those insurance claims broken down by the race of the doctor? It wouldn’t be pretty, that’s for sure.

You can see why they should just stick to re-heating pizza, eh?

The Lady Doth Protest Too Much

Ophelia Benson blogged about that problem first off, then she got nastily jumped on by the male atheist blogger Geoffrey Falk….

I resent that implication: I’ve never “jumped on” Ophelia Benson.

I’m not sure any man has: there’s really very little one would want to jump on to “do the nasty,” quite frankly. Heh.

And is it really necessary to specify that someone named “Geoffrey” is male? I mean, I don’t think that I’ve ever felt it necessary to clarify that the “Ophelia” in question is a woman—as opposed to all the other Ophelias in the world who are men, you know?—so what, exactly, is up with that?

In no other context is that girl ever so imprecise as to talk about mere quantity (e.g., in the below-proportional representation of women at atheist conferences), when she means quality. It’s no accident that she blurred the distinction in her own “oppressed” group’s favor, there—just as she’s found “unfairness to women” in Kali vs. Jehovah, by “feministing” (i.e., inexcusably misrepresenting) the facts.

When you see people provably inventing ways in which they’re supposedly being mistreated, you can be certain that they really have very little to complain about at all, in any dispassionate and coherent analysis.

And if she tries to say that it was all just an accident?

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.”

With what these persecution-complex people try to get away with, simply respecting the facts will make you a “sexist,” in their crossed eyes. So, I’m proud to “be one.”

Plus, blacks and gays truly are every bit as “underrepresented” as speakers (and attendees) at atheist conferences as are women. If the cause of the latter is sexism, how could the cause of the former not be racism and homophobia? In all seriousness, if male atheists are sexists and unfair-treaters-of-others for not even noticing that they’ve “left women out” from their conferences, then white women like Benson are racists for not noticing or caring that there are even fewer blacks than women (even just proportionately, never mind in raw numbers) at the same shows. It’s just parity of argument. But these atheists are so superficial in their thought, that they haven’t even figured that much out.

If you want to go down that road, there is a very predictable end-point, in which every whining Designated Victim group is accorded its proportional representation at those conferences, regardless of the quality of their work. In that world, meritocracy is sexism, the demand for even minimal competence from minorities is racism … and war is peace. That was exactly the line of thinking that I was “nastily jumping on” Benson for implicitly indulging in. How anyone could defend her in that, is beyond me.

They won’t be satisfied until they’ve watered-down the quality of the “New Atheism” to make it “fair” for women—i.e., to allow women to “compete” and succeed at the same level as men, 50/50—in the same way as they’re Title IX-ing science. God damn them for that.

The Brain as explained by John Cleese

Blame it All on Nietzsche

Blame it All on Nietzsche:

Nazism, unlike revolutionary communism of the Marxist-Leninist varieties, was never an atheistic system. Whereas Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and others may have thought they were somehow doing the work of History, the Nazis were convinced that they were doing God’s work. Whatever the Nazi leaders may have picked up from Nietzsche, it wasn’t his atheism. Indeed, atheists were among those whom the Nazis hated. Moreover, Nietzsche was not anti-Semitic; he was contemptuous of anti-Semites. But the most horrifying of the Nazi actions—the death camps that were used to kill millions of Jews and others in the most cruel and atrocious ways—were a result of the extreme anti-Semitism pervading Nazi thought. Wherever the Nazis got this from, and it’s not that hard to guess [i.e., Christianity/Catholicism], it wasn’t from the thought of Friedrich Nietzsche.