Spirit on the Brain

Book-in-Progress: Spirit on the Brain: The Paleolithic, Neolithic, Neurological and Magical Origins of Religion

This forthcoming book (c. 2012) will trace the evolution of religion and meditation-based spirituality from paleolithic, pre-scientific times into our own—from shamanic rituals and healing, through alchemy, into the neuroscience underlying higher-state-of-consciousness experiences.

Recent Posts:

February 15, 2010: The Happiness Hypothesis

February 12, 2010: Chris Hallquist debunks the resurrection

November 22, 2009: The Faith Instinct (Review)

Lars Vilks: why some European artists are building panic rooms

Lars Vilks: why some European artists are building panic rooms:

Why did Lars Vilks, a mild-mannered Swede who calls himself “the artist,” booby-trap his art with electrified barbed wire, keep an ax by his bedside, and build a panic room upstairs? For one, Mr. Vilks’s 2007 cartoon of the prophet Mohammed as a stray dog continues to bring death threats and even a bounty on his head from an Al Qaeda-related group in Iraq. But after US authorities on Tuesday arrested Colleen LaRose, a Philadelphia woman known on the Internet as Jihad Jane, for allegedly planning to travel to rural Sweden and assassinate Vilks, civil libertarians such as George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley are pointing to another potential incentive for European artists to protect themselves: growing deference shown to Islam by European governments and journalists worried about stoking fanatical flames….

“As an artist, you have to take a stand for things. If you do something, you have to take full responsibility for it,” Vilks told the Associated Press. “I’m actually not interested in offending the prophet. The point is actually to show that you can. There is nothing so holy you can’t offend it.”

Meanwhile, here in Canada, an ugly little Muslim bitch was just expelled for refusing to remove her niqab in French class … after previously agreeing that she would do so, as a condition of enrolling. (If you check out the comments for that article, you’ll find many that I thoroughly agree with … which pretty much explains why the comments have now been “closed” on the piece. Heh.)

Of course, the stupid little goat-fuckeress made the mistake of challenging the people in Quebec on the issue which plays the biggest role in their claims of unfair treatment by the rest of the nation: the French language, and its inherent relation to Quebec’s claims of being a “unique culture.” If it wasn’t happening in a French class, the whining Frogs might well be on her side….

One Day Like This

In celebration of two beautiful days in a row in Toronto, in March:

Ah! Levy!

Eugene Levy could have done a great parody of this, back in the SCTV days:

Tom Delay: People Are Unemployed Because They Want To Be

Tom Delay: People Are Unemployed Because They Want To Be:

“You know,” Delay said, “there is an argument to be made that these extensions, the unemployment benefits keeps people from going and finding jobs. In fact there are some studies that have been done that show people stay on unemployment compensation and they don’t look for a job until two or three weeks before they know the benefits are going to run out.”

Host Candy Crowley: Congressman, that’s a hard sell, isn’t it?

Delay: it’s the truth.

Crowley: People are unemployed because they want to be?

Delay: Well, it is the truth. and people in the real world know it. And they have friends and they know it. Sure, we ought to be helping people that are unemployed find a job, but we also have budget considerations that are incredibly important, especially now that Obama is spending monies that we don’t have.

I think that’s largely true, though it of course leaves out the effect of legal and illegal immigration on the availability of jobs, and the driving-down of wages, even in I.T. (i.e., if wages were higher, there would be more incentive to get off the dole).

What’s even worse, though, are employees at seasonal/tourist resorts, who work a 17-20 week summer, and then draw UI over the winters without even pretending to look for a job.

Lot of that going on around Kenora, in Northwestern Ontario.

PG

Ane Brun & Peter Gabriel!

Ane [Brun] [MySpace] is going on tour this spring with Peter Gabriel in Europe, Canada and the US! She has been invited to join Peter Gabriel’s band as a singer on his “New Blood Tour.” Together with a large orchestra, Peter Gabriel will perform his new album “Skratch my back” and also a set of classic Peter Gabriel songs in an orchestral setting.

Peter Gabriel discovered Ane Brun when they both performed at the Nelson Mandela “46664” concert in Tromsø, Norway, in 2005.

I didn’t even know that my all-time favorite (PG) had a new album out! He’ll be touring Canada! And he always stops in Toronto, ’cause that’s where he recorded his first solo album (with producer Bob Ezrin) and met his long-time bassist, Tony Levin!!

I’m excited!!!

P.S. Alright, he’s playing Montreal … but no Toronto date (yet)? WTF?

Go Cognitive

Go Cognitive: Educational Tools for Cognitive Neuroscience.

Pop Psych

You know David Rosenhan’s study about how diagnostic labels cause prejudicial and harmful treatment? From Lilienfeld et al.’s 50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology (p. 182):

Eight mentally healthy individuals—including Rosenhan himself—presented themselves to a total of 12 mental hospitals. According to plan, all pretended to exhibit mild anxiety and requested admission based on a supposed complain of unusual auditory hallucinations, namely hearing voices that repeated the words “empty,” “hollow,” and “thud.” Interestingly, all of these “pseudopatients” (fake patients) were admitted to the hospital: One was diagnosed with manic depression, the other 11 with schizophrenia. Once admitted, the pseudopatients stopped faking any symptoms of mental disorder. Aside from extensive note-taking for the purpose of data collection, the pseudopatients acted normally to see whether the hospital staff would discover their absence of illness and release them. Yet surprisingly, the pseudopatients were kept in the hospital for an average of 19 days, each with the same change in diagnosis. Their original condition was merely reclassified as “in remission,” meaning “no longer displaying symptoms of illness.” Rosenhan interpreted these findings to mean that mental health professionals can’t distinguish normality from abnormality, because all patients retained their original diagnoses upon discharge….

In a flurry of comments … scholars observed that Rosenhan … had used seriously flawed methodology, ignored relevant data, and reached uns0und conclusions. In perhaps the most devastating critique, Spitzer … contended that Rosenhan’s own data ironically offered the best evidence against his claims. For example, recall that all 12 pseudopatients’ discharge diagnoses were amended to “in remission.” This change means that the abnormal behavior noted at intake was no longer present at discharge. Spitzer gathered data suggesting that “in remission” diagnoses were extremely rare, if not unheard of, in psychiatric hospitals. The fact that all 12 pseudopatients’ diagnoses were changed in the same unusual way shows just how capably the staff recognized normal behavior when the pseudopatients stopped faking symptoms. As Spitzer noted, this fact counters Rosenhan’s claim that mental health professionals can’t distinguish normality from abnormality.

Unrelated, but from the same book (p. 249):

Research based on U.S. census reports suggests that an unusually large number of people live in places with names similar to their first names. For example, there are significantly more Georges living in Georgia than one would expect by chance, and the same holds for Louises living in Louisiana and Virginias living in Virginia…. This effect, which is small in magnitude, appears to result from people with certain names gravitating to places with similar names. This effect may reflect a form of “implicit egotism” in which people are drawn unconsciously to people, places, and things that resemble them.

Uh, yeah. Or it could result from parents naming their children in honor of the state they live in … or being “clever,” as when Mr. and Mrs. Thompson name their son Tommy, or Mr. and Mrs. Ball name their daughter Crystal. You could sort of settle that by splitting the above results based on whether the people were born in the state in question, or relocated (i.e., “gravitated to”) there; in the former case, there would obviously be no “implicit egotism” at work. I haven’t read the original study, but judging from the fact that the skeptical authors of the book didn’t bother to mention that highly-significant idea….

In related news, 96% of the girls named Kayleigh, living in the UK, were born after Marillion’s hit single of the same name. No word on whether they “gravitated to” the UK from elsewhere in the world….

Some psychological research indicates that dogs resemble their owners. In one study, judges matched the faces of dog owners to their dogs at significantly better than chance levels, although this was true only of purebred, not mixed, breeds….

Implicit egotism on the part of the (purebred) dogs, for choosing (wealthy, egocentic) owners who looked like them? Lilienfeld, et al., might think so….

(Has anyone tried that test with Paris Hilton’s or Sharon Osbourne’s pets?)

The skeptical authors also weigh in on Columbine (p. 162-5):

On the morning of April 20, 1999—perhaps not coincidentally, Adolph Hitler’s 110th birthday—two teenage students dressed in black trenchcoats strolled calmly into Columbine High School….

Interestingly, Harris and Klebold appeared to be anything but uncertain of themselves. Both were fascinated with Nazism and preoccupied with fantasies of world domination. Harris’s diaries revealed that he saw himself as morally superior to others and felt contempt for almost all of his peers.

Reminds me of myself, back when I still had some faith left in humanity.

I’m still not convinced about the “fascinated with Nazism” thing—for one thing, Klebold and Harris had originally planned the attack for the day before it happened, but had to delay it. So the “Hitler’s birthday” thing is obvious bullshit.

If they were fascinated with Nazism, there’s an easy explanation for that: In stark contrast to their powerless daily lives, Nazi role-playing allowed them membership in a very powerful group—a group which didn’t have to take shit from anyone.

The “skeptics,” again:

Harris and Klebold had frequently been teased [correction: bullied mercilessly] by classmates, and most commentators assumed that this mistreatment produced low self-esteem, bolstering Harris and Klebold’s risk for violence…. Tempting as it may be, we can’t draw the inference that because teasing [correction: merciless bullying] precedes violence, it necessarily produces it. Instead, Harris and Klebold’s high self-esteem may have led them to perceive the taunts of their classmates as threats to their inflated sense of self-worth, motivating them to seek revenge.

One’s jaw drops at reading such braindead skeptical “insight”—with Barry Beyerstein’s name on it, no less! Professor of fucking psychology at Simon Fraser! (though he died before the book was completed, so this may be someone else’s brain fart). A modicum of research, via Wikipedia, discloses:

In his journal, Klebold wrote about his view that he and Harris were god-like and more highly evolved than every other human being. His secret journal, however, records self-loathing and suicidal intentions.

From Brooks Brown’s No Easy Answers: The Truth Behind Death at Columbine (p. 20):

Like Dylan, Eric was exceptionally smart. And like Dylan, Eric saw the injustices of the world quite clearly, even as he was getting beat up [not merely "teased"] in the high school locker room or jumping to avoid the glass bottles thrown at him out of the passing cars of Columbine football players….

Kids are raised on the playgrounds of their schools, where they learn that “might makes right” and that physical brawn is a far more important asset than intelligence and cunning. Yet they also learn that when they fight back, they are punished by the people who are supposed to protect them and to dispense justice.

Dylan was harassed by kids who had never been taught [by their unfit parents and criminally irresponsible teachers/principals] why it’s wrong to beat up another classmate, or whose self-esteem was so crushed that they felt that had to destroy his, too, so theirs could be pumped up a little more.

The world, at its heart, has logical rules. Yet young people today are being taught that the opposite is true. Kids grow up in a world where they learn through experience that life is cruel, that their fellow human beings are mean-spirited bullies, and that basic questions about right and wrong are answered with rules that have no basis in reason other than “Because I said so.”

As a result, they hunt for something to believe in.

Not only that, but smart kids like Dylan and Eric (and Brooks, who tested 99th percentile as a kid) are able to figure out that the people are who “respected leaders in their communities” today were, twenty years ago, bullies throwing bottles out of cars at nerds … and that, twenty years from now, the same jocks who tormented them will be respected community leaders. Because people never really grow up, i.e., adults are really just teenagers with sagging breasts and wrinkles, not people who are in any way psychologically mature. Thus, the high-school-psychology bullying and in-grouping predictably never really stops. (I’ve experienced this in my thirties from pot-bellied MBA’s … and even in my forties, living in neighborhoods populated by shit-skin immigrants and shit-for-brains white proles.)

P. 251-2:

Dylan was angry with society, with the hand he had been dealt, and with a world where he couldn’t go a day without being spat it, mocked, or told he wasn’t good enough. He was made to believe that his dreams could never happen, and that the world would never get better….

I knew Dylan long enough to know that he didn’t start out as a monster. He became one. That what makes his fate so scary.

It’s a shame, too, because he had been accepted by the University of Arizona … to study computer design (i.e., Computer Engineering). He could be doing work today that the jocks who tormented him couldn’t understand, even if their trivial, worthless lives depended on it.

Just like Yours Truly. ‘Cause I didn’t start out as a (racist, sexist, etc.) monster either. :)

Married With Children had a great take on this (“growing up”), in their high-school reunion episode, where Peggy bumped into her old nemesis/competition, Connie Bender:

Connie: Peggy! “Peggy Wanker, don’t bother to thank her.”

Peggy: Connie! “Connie Bender, bring a friend, it won’t offend her.”

And then they walked straight past each other, their noses in the air, as if no time had passed at all. Which, in terms of maturity, it hadn’t.

Brown, p. 43, 50-1, 69:

Teachers would punish any kid who was involved in a fight, no matter who had started it. One time I was in the locker room after gym class when, without any provocation, a kid came up and kicked me square in the crotch. I immediately dropped to the ground, while my friend Matt Cornwell jumped on the offending kid and started throwing punches. All three of us wound up in the office.

Even though all three of us told the same story—the first kid even admitted that he’d kicked me first—all three of us were punished. I received a suspension simply because I’d been involved, even though I’d never thrown a single punch….

Sometimes kids would just ignore us. But often, we were targets. We were freshmen, and computer-geek freshmen at that. At lunchtime the jocks would kick our chairs, or push us down onto the table from behind. They would knock our food trays onto the floor, trip us, or throw food as we were walking by. When we sat down, they would pelt us with candy from another table. In the hallways, they would push kids into lockers and call them names while their friends stood by and laughed at the show….

Seniors at Columbine would do things like pour baby oil on the floor, then literally “go bowling” with freshmen; they would throw the kid across the floor, and since he couldn’t stop, he’d crash right into other kids while the jocks pointed and giggled….

One guy, a wrestler who everyone knew to avoid, liked to make kids get down on the ground and push pennies along the floor with their noses. This would happen during school hours, as kids were passing from one class to another. Teachers would see it and look the other way. “Boys will be boys,” they’d say, and laugh….

The bullies liked to propel paper clips at us with a rubber band. If a teacher saw you get hid, he or she did nothing. But as soon as you threw it back, or did something to defend yourself, you were done. The teacher would grab you and you would be in the office. We were the “undesirables,” and the teachers were just waiting for an excuse to nail us. The bullies knew it….

Two students repeatedly bullied a fifteen-year-old classmate in Physical Education class two  years before the shooting. “The victim was repeatedly subjected to ‘twisters,’ a form of pinching and twisting the skin”…. “Although the class was in session, the teacher didn’t acknowledge knowing what was taking place. Another form of bullying against this student, a practicing Jew, involved racial slurs and ethic intimidation, including threatening by the bullies to ‘build an oven and set him on fire.’ Each time a basket was made during P.E. basketball, the bullies would state, ‘that’s another Jew in the oven’”….

Jocks would call the girls who hung out with the Trench Coat Mafia “sluts” and “Nazi lesbians.” One day at lunch the jocks threw a bag full of ice water on a member of the group, which led to a fight outside. When security intervened, the Trench Coat Mafia kids wound up with three-day suspensions. The jocks who had started the fight were never even sent to the office.

I can tell you what I would have done if I had grown up in that environment: Bought a gun, and used it.

Page 202, 205:

Harris recalls [in their basement tapes] how he moved around so much with his military family and always had to start over, “at the bottom of the ladder.” People continually made fun of him—“my face, my hair, my shirts.” As for Klebold, “If you could see all the anger I’ve stored over the past four f——ing years …” he says…. As far back as the Foothills Day Care center, he hated the “stuck-up” kids he felt hated him. “Being shy didn’t help,” he admits. “I’m going to kill you all. You’ve been giving us s—— for years”….

They explain over and over why they want to kill as many people as they can. Kids taunted them in elementary school, in middle school, in high school. Adults wouldn’t let them strike back, to fight their tormentors, the way such disputes once were settled in schoolyards. So they gritted their teeth. And their rage grew. “It’s humanity,” Klebold says, flipping an obscene gesture toward the camera. “Look at what you made,” he tells the world. “You’re fucking shit, you humans, and you deserve to die.”

That’s what happens when people “threaten your high self-esteem” … by making your life not worth living just because they can, eh? Moron, incompetent-researching bloody incompetent skeptics. But then, when have you ever seen real psychological insight from such people? In all seriousness, in half a dozen years of learning from (and bettering) them, I can’t recall having ever been impressed with their confidently-meager knowledge of human nature. (Including their own gullibility when it comes to trusting government, the medical profession, and big business.) And these are the ones who consider themselves fit to debunk the myths of pop psychology!

Things were better at Columbine [after the shooting], as far as how people treated one another,” [Brooks' brother ] Aaron recalls. “At least, that’s how it was for the first month or so. But by two or three months after we got back, things were back to the way they had been before”….

Attempts are already being made to rewrite history…. [I]n this morning’s paper, a Columbine teacher told the reporter, “[Harris and Klebold] scared me more than any other kids in the building. They bullied more kids [e.g., in calling younger ones—the only people in the world they could look down upon—‘faggots’] than they were bullied.”

It was better for awhile because the jocks knew damned well why Eric and Dylan shot up the school, and they were scared about provoking the same thing again, and taking a well-deserved bullet through the head in return for their wanton cruelty. But then they tried getting away with little stuff, and nobody said anything, and they didn’t get punished for it; and then they tried bigger stuff, and got away with it…. So where else would that spiral end up, except back exactly where it started? Especially when you’re dealing with sociopaths (the conscience-bereft jocks, I mean; not Harris and Klebold):

Dylan promises his parents [in the tapes] that there was nothing they could have done to stop him. According to the Rocky Mountain News article, “War is War,” “You can’t understand what we feel,” he says. “You can’t understand, no matter how much you think you can.”

The Rocky Mountain News quoted Eric as offering praise for his parents. “My parents are the best fucking parents I have ever known,” he says. “My dad is great. I wish I was a fucking sociopath so I don’t have any remorse, but I do. This is going to tear them apart. They will never forget it.”

Mechanical Prediction

From Lilienfeld, et al.’s 50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology (p. 228-30):

Over half a century ago, the brilliant clinical psychologist Paul Meehl … provided an insightful analysis of clinical decision-making, outlining two approaches to this task. He referred to the traditional approach, which relies on judgment and intuition, as the clinical method. When using the mechanical method, a formal algorithm (set of decision rules) such as a statistical equation or “actuarial table” is constructed to help make decisions in new cases. Insurance companies have used actuarial tables for decades to evaluate risk and set premiums. For example, they can use knowledge of someone’s age, sex, health-related behaviors, medical history, and the like to predict how many more years he or she will live….

Meehl … reviewed the 20 studies available at the time to compare the accuracy of clinical and mechanical predictions when researchers supplied both the practitioner and the formula with the same information. To the shock of many readers, he found that mechanical predictions were at least as accurate as clinical predictions, sometimes more. Other reviewers have since updated this literature … which now includes more than 130 studies that meet stringent criteria for a fair comparison between the two prediction methods. They’ve found that Meehl’s central conclusion remains unchanged and unchallenged: Mechanical predictions are equally or more accurate than clinical predictions. This verdict holds true not only for mental health experts making psychiatric diagnoses, forecasting psychotherapy outcome, or predicting suicide attempts, but also for experts predicting performance in college, graduate school, military training, the workplace, or horse races; detecting lies; predicting criminal behavior; and making medical diagnoses or predicting the length of hospitalization or death. At present, there’s no clear exception to the rule that mechanical methods allow experts to predict at least as accurately as the clinical method, usually more so….

Some object to mechanical prediction because “probability is irrelevant to the unique individual.” In particular, they claim that knowing the outcomes for other people is of no use when making a decision for a new patient, because “every person is different.”

What I find interesting, there, is that we have no qualms about being treated as “numbers in actuarial tables” when it comes to paying for health insurance, split down by men vs. women, or by smokers vs. non-smokers, and perhaps someday by healthy vegetarians vs. heart-disease-prone meat-eaters, etc., and certainly someday by genetic flaws which we can’t do anything about, and have been stuck with through no fault of our own … and we certainly don’t consider the (actuarial tables) practice itself to be the least bit immoral … yet if you judge others by their membership in, say, a high-crime group (e.g., poor blacks), you’re guilty not merely of judging individuals based on the characteristics of their group, but of a moral fallacy (and a moral failing).

If racism and sexism are morally wrong (for judging people by the characteristics of their group), then group-characteristic-based insurance must be equally morally wrong. And so are all other forms of mechanical prediction, even though they work better (i.e., “as well as or better,” which on average is better) than the “clinical method” of treating people as individuals.

That is, the most-efficient way of doing things, which causes the least total suffering, and the greatest benefit for the greatest number, is also morally wrong.

Ponder that, Utilitarians!

BTW, meat-eaters should indeed be evaluated against different actuarial tables than vegetarians are. You don’t even need to be a vegetarian to agree with that: if you’re a moronic, magical-thinking Steveospheric carnivore, for example, you surely think that vegetarians are inherently sickly creatures, who would therefore be a drain on the health-care industry. So you can endorse treating them differently even while—nay, especially while—chawing down on a thick, cholesterol-laden steak.

You’d be wrong, woefully wrong, about the respective health effects; but you’d be paying through your own pocketbook (not mine) for that privilege, so “everyone wins” (except the animals, and the environment in general, in the waste of water and grain, and the polluted agricultural runoff).

Plus, as a meat-eating Steveospheric moron, you’ll likely die sooner; so again, “everyone wins.”

Title IX

Feminists and minority activists could learn so much from this man:

While most would have let the deformity relegate them to watching from the stands, Jeremy [Davis] was determined to participate in high school athletics. Yet he made it clear from the first day of wrestling practice that he would only join the team under one condition: that no matter what, his teammates would always take it easy on him. Jeremy made sure they knew he would rather quit than let his teammates treat him just like everyone else, and made it clear he wanted them to let him win whenever possible.

“When I first joined the wrestling team, everyone went out of their way to act as if I was just another wrestler,” Davis said. “That made absolutely no sense to me. I had to tell them, ‘Fellas, just because I only have one arm doesn’t mean that I don’t want you to recognize that fact. Come on, I’m at a clear disadvantage here! Ease up!’”

“Ever since I spoke openly about my condition, and the guys started treating me like I was completely different and separate from the rest of the team, everything has been great,” a smiling Davis added. “Now my teammates aren’t scared to really get in there, to let me put them into these really cool holds. They let me pin them, too. It’s awesome.

Yes, it’s The Onion. Still, I can’t help but thinking that if the Gloria Steinems and Jesse Jacksons of the world—people who would truly rather quit than be treated like everyone else, and who make it clear that we (i.e., white men) have to let them win whenever possible, if we want to avoid being called sexists and racists—were to take this young (fictitious) man’s example to heart, they might at least be able to stop lying to themselves about how getting all the special treatment they “deserve” will finally make them “equal.”

“If I sense, even for a second, that the people I’m going up against aren’t feeling sorry for me or taking pity on me, I’ll stop right there in the middle of the game and say, ‘You need to hold back more. You need to let me sack that quarterback,’” Davis said. “Look, I like sacking the quarterback, okay? It’s a great feeling. And if the only way for me to get that feeling is for somebody to feel bad for me, so be it.”

This is approximately the effect that Title IX is having on science in the U.S.

To many, Jeremy is an inspiration. Corey Hamlin, one of his teammates on the varsity baseball team, said that Jeremy is so passionate and focused on being singled out that, if you forget he has a physical deformity for even a moment, he will go out of his way to remind you of his affliction.

“He always says, ‘Don’t you ever, ever, ever treat me like I’m one of the guys,’” Hamlin said. “One time in practice, I made the mistake of throwing him a normal fastball. He immediately threw down his bat and asked me what the hell I was trying to prove. I got the message loud and clear. I never tried to strike him out as an equal again.”

You remember how I got accused of “nastily jump[ing] on” Ophelia Benson when she was whining about how women weren’t being proportionately represented (in quantity, not in quality, and not with respect to their representation in the top 5%) at that atheists’ conference? It’s sorta like that.